CO129-211 - Governor Sir Bowen - 1883 [8-9] — Page 187

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

182

For Britannic Majesty's Exequatur. On inquiring at the Harbour Master's office as to the origin of the practice complained of, I was referred by the master to section 14 of the Merchant Shipping Ordinance 1879 as authority for collecting the fee. It will be seen that this section of the Ordinance directs the Harbour Master to charge for every seaman shipped a fee of $10.

In my opinion, this means for every seaman shipped at the Harbour Master's office. The word "fee" implies a compensation or reward for a service rendered, distinguished from a tax, which is a burden or charge imposed for the support of Government without reference to any benefit to the party paying it. There can be no propriety in the Harbour Master charging a fee for work done by me. I do not think it was the intention of the Ordinance to deprive Consuls in this Colony of the right to discharge their principal functions—shipping crews for merchant ships of their countries. Section 5 must have been intended...

Edit History

2026-05-23 15:35:02 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
182 For Britannic Majesty's Exequatur. On inquiring at the Harbour Master's office as to the origin of the practice complained of, I was referred by the master to section 14 of the Merchant Shipping Ordinance 1879 as authority for collecting the fee. It will be seen that this section of the Ordinance directs the Harbour Master to charge for every seaman shipped a fee of $10. In my opinion, this means for every seaman shipped at the Harbour Master's office. The word "fee" implies a compensation or reward for a service rendered, distinguished from a tax, which is a burden or charge imposed for the support of Government without reference to any benefit to the party paying it. There can be no propriety in the Harbour Master charging a fee for work done by me. I do not think it was the intention of the Ordinance to deprive Consuls in this Colony of the right to discharge their principal functions—shipping crews for merchant ships of their countries. Section 5 must have been intended...
Baseline (Original)
3. 182 For Britannic Majestys Exequatur. On inqurring at the Tarbour Master's office. as is the origin of she practice complained of I was referred by the master to section is four Tof the Merchant Shipping Ordinance 1879 as authority for collecting the fee. It will be seen that this section of the Ordinance directs the Fagbour "Master to charge for every seaman shipped a fee of $10 my opinion this means for every seaman shipped at the Tarbour Master's office. The word "fee implies a compensation but in hany. or reward for a service rendered on a distinguished from a tax which is a ourden or charge imposed for the support of Government without reference to a any benefit to the party paying it. There can be no propriety in the Harbour Master charging a bee for work done I by ine. I do not think it was the intention. of the ordinance to deprive Consul in this Salony one o of the right to discharge then principal functions_shipping Craws for FA Merchant ships of their countries. Section 5 must have been intended chert
2026-05-23 15:35:02 · Baseline
View content

3.

182

For Britannic Majestys Exequatur. On inqurring at the Tarbour Master's office. as is the origin

of she practice complained of I was referred by the

master to section is four

Tof the Merchant Shipping Ordinance 1879 as authority for collecting the fee. It will be seen that this section of the Ordinance directs the Fagbour "Master to charge for every seaman shipped a fee of $10

my opinion this means for every seaman shipped at the Tarbour Master's office. The word "fee implies a compensation

but in

hany.

or reward for a service rendered

on

a

distinguished from a tax

which is a ourden or

charge

imposed for the support of Government without reference to a

any benefit to the party paying it. There can be no propriety in the Harbour Master charging a bee for

work done

I

by ine. I do not

think it was the intention. of the ordinance to deprive Consul

in this Salony one o of the right to discharge then principal functions_shipping

Craws

for

FA Merchant ships

of their countries. Section 5

must have been intended

chert

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.